Effectiveness of Fartlek Training on Maximum Oxygen Consumption and Resting Pulse Rate in Relay Runners
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Relay running requires a combination of high-intensity effort, aerobic support, cardiovascular efficiency, and rapid recovery between repeated efforts. Fartlek training, or “speed play,” alternates running intensity within a continuous session and may therefore match the physiological demands of relay athletes. Objective: To evaluate the effect of a six-week Fartlek training program on maximum oxygen consumption (VO₂max) and resting pulse rate (RPR) in relay runners and to compare the magnitude of adaptation with conventional high-intensity interval training. Methods: A randomized controlled, parallel-group study was conducted with 40 relay runners aged 18–30 years. Participants were allocated to a Fartlek Training Group (n=20) or a Conventional Training Group (n=20). Training was undertaken three times per week. VO₂max was estimated using the Queen College Step Test and RPR was measured using a pulse oximeter after a standardized quiet-rest period. Pre-test and post-test values were analyzed with paired t-tests, between-group comparisons with independent t-tests, and practical magnitude with Cohen’s d. Results: The Fartlek group increased VO₂max from 44.82±6.21 to 48.91±5.84 ml/kg/min (+4.09; +9.13%; p<0.001) and reduced RPR from 72.45±5.23 to 66.20±4.81 bpm (−6.25; −8.63%; p<0.001). The conventional group also improved significantly, with VO₂max increasing by 2.46 ml/kg/min (+5.45%) and RPR decreasing by 3.45 bpm (−4.81%) (both p<0.001). Absolute post-test differences were not statistically significant; however, change-score analysis favored Fartlek training for VO₂max (p=0.016, d=0.80) and RPR (p=0.013, d=−0.83). Conclusion: Six weeks of structured Fartlek training produced significant and practically meaningful improvements in aerobic capacity and resting cardiovascular efficiency in relay runners, with greater change-score improvements than conventional interval training.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
Haugen T, Sandbakk Ø, Seiler S, Tønnessen E. The training characteristics of the world’s most successful female cross-country skier. Front Physiol. 2021;12:661518.
Midgley AW, McNaughton LR, Wilkinson M. Is there an optimal training intensity for enhancing the maximal oxygen uptake of distance runners? Empirical research findings, current opinions, physiological rationale and practical recommendations. Sports Med. 2006;36(2):117-132.
Spencer MR, Gastin PB. Energy system contribution during 200- to 1500-m running in highly trained athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33(1):157-162.
Billat VL. Interval training for performance: a scientific and empirical practice. Special recommendations for middle- and long-distance running. Part I: aerobic interval training. Sports Med. 2001;31(1):13-31.
Helgerud J, Høydal K, Wang E, Karlsen T, Berg P, Bjerkaas M, et al. Aerobic high-intensity intervals improve VO₂max more than moderate training. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007;39(4):665-671.
Seiler KS, Kjerland GØ. Quantifying training intensity distribution in elite endurance athletes: is there evidence for an “optimal” distribution? Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2006;16(1):49-56.
Shukla N, Srivastava A, Agarwal N. The Fartlek training method with multiple valences: a review. Int J Innov Sci Res Technol. 2023;8(3):1-6.
American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. 11th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2021.
Gastin PB. Energy system interaction and relative contribution during maximal exercise. Sports Med. 2001;31(10):725-741.
Holloszy JO, Coyle EF. Adaptations of skeletal muscle to endurance exercise and their metabolic consequences. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1984;56(4):831-838.
Aubert AE, Seps B, Beckers F. Heart rate variability in athletes. Sports Med. 2003;33(12):889-919.
Salameh H. The effect of high intensity interval training and Fartlek training on some physical and physiological characteristics amongst soccer beginners [thesis]. Nablus: An-Najah National University; 2013.
Desai S, Poovishnudevi T. Effectiveness of Fartlek training on maximum oxygen consumption and resting pulse rate in recreational football players. Afr J Biomed Res. 2024;27(3):2688-2693.
Bassett DR, Howley ET. Limiting factors for maximum oxygen uptake and determinants of endurance performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32(1):70-84.
Levine BD. VO₂max: what do we know, and what do we still need to know? J Physiol. 2008;586(1):25-34.
Dupont G, McCall A, Prieur F, Millet GP, Berthoin S. Faster oxygen uptake kinetics during recovery is related to better repeated sprinting ability. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010;110(3):627-634.
Borresen J, Lambert MI. Autonomic control of heart rate during and after exercise: measurements and implications for monitoring training status. Sports Med. 2008;38(8):633-646.
Achten J, Jeukendrup AE. Heart rate monitoring: applications and limitations. Sports Med. 2003;33(7):517-538.
Laursen PB, Jenkins DG. The scientific basis for high-intensity interval training: optimising training programmes and maximising performance in highly trained endurance athletes. Sports Med. 2002;32(1):53-73.
Buchheit M, Laursen PB. High-intensity interval training, solutions to the programming puzzle: Part I: cardiopulmonary emphasis. Sports Med. 2013;43(5):313-338.