Strategic Human Resource Management Tools and Their Impact on Sustainable Workspaces in Gurugram Cybercity

Main Article Content

Ritika Rathee,Prof. (Dr.) Anupama Pandey

Abstract

This research examines the integration of Strategic Human Resource Management (SHRM) tools within sustainable workspace frameworks in Gurugram Cybercity, India's premier technology hub. The study investigates how contemporary SHRM practices contribute to environmental sustainability, organizational resilience, and employee well-being in the post-pandemic BANI (Brittle, Anxious, Nonlinear, Incomprehensible) world. Through a comprehensive literature review and analysis of sustainable HRM practices, this paper identifies key SHRM tools that enable organizations to create sustainable workspaces while maintaining competitive advantage. The findings reveal that organizations implementing comprehensive sustainable HRM strategies demonstrate improved employee engagement, reduced environmental impact, and enhanced organizational performance. The research contributes to the growing body of knowledge on sustainable HRM by providing a framework for implementing SHRM tools in technology-intensive environments, such as Gurugram Cybercity.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ritika Rathee,Prof. (Dr.) Anupama Pandey. (2025). Strategic Human Resource Management Tools and Their Impact on Sustainable Workspaces in Gurugram Cybercity. International Journal of Advanced Research and Multidisciplinary Trends (IJARMT), 2(3), 203–226. Retrieved from https://www.ijarmt.com/index.php/j/article/view/377
Section
Articles

References

Macke, J.; Genari, D. Systematic Literature Review on Sustainable Human Resource Management. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 208, 806–815.

Aust, I.; Matthews, B.; Muller-Camen, M. Common Good HRM: A Paradigm Shift in Sustainable HRM? Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 2020, 30, 100705.

De Godoy, M.F.; Filho, D.R. Facing the BANI World. Int. J. Nutrology 2021, 14, 33.

Taskan, B.; Junça-Silva, A.; Caetano, A. Clarifying the Conceptual Map of VUCA: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Organ. Anal. 2022, 30, 196–217.

F. Dieffenbacher, S. BANI World: What Is It and Why We Need It? Digital Leadership. 2023. Available online: https://digitalleadership.com/blog/bani-world/ (accessed on 23 February 2024).

Malichova, E.; Miciak, M. The Comparison of Managers’ Decision-Making on Investment Processes in IT and Industrial Enterprises. In Innovation Management and Education Excellence through Vision 2020 : Proceedings of the 31st International Business Information Management Association Conference (IBIMA), Milan, Italy, 25–26 April 2018; Soliman, K.S., Ed.; International Business Information Management Association (IBIMA): Norristown, PA, USA, 2018; pp. 4999–5009.

Piwowar-Sulej, K. Core Functions of Sustainable Human Resource Management. A Hybrid Literature Review with the Use of H-Classics Methodology. Sustain. Dev. 2021, 29, 671–693.

De Stefano, F.; Bagdadli, S.; Camuffo, A. The HR Role in Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability: A Boundary-Shifting Literature Review. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2018, 57, 549–566.

Vodák, J.; Soviar, J.; Lendel, V. Cooperation Management in Slovak Enterprises. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2014, 109, 1147–1151.

Jepsen, D.M.; Grob, S. Sustainability in Recruitment and Selection: Building a Framework of Practices. J. Educ. Sustain. Dev. 2015, 9, 160–178.

Blašková, M.; Tumová, D.; Mičiak, M. Taxonomy of Factors Involved in Decision-Making to Sustain Organization Members’ Creativity. Adm. Sci. 2022, 12, 39.

Ferenc, P.; Varmus, M.; Vodák, J. Stakeholders in the Various Field and Relations between Them. Procedia Eng. 2017, 192, 166–170.

Demjanovičová, M.; Varmus, M. Changing the Perception of Business Values in the Perspective of Environmental Sustainability. Sustainability 2021, 13, 5226.

Jankalova, M.; Jankal, R. The Proximity Rate of the Corporate Social Responsibility Concept in the Excellence Models. Qual.-Access Success 2016, 17, 71–83.

Jankalova, M.; Jankal, R. Corporate Social Responsibility in the Context of National Awards for Social Responsibility in the Slovakia and Czech Republic. In Proceedings of the Selected Papers of 5th World Conference on Business, Economics and Management (BEM-2016), Stockholm, Sweden, 3–5 August 2023; Bektas; Bektas, C., Ed.; Sciencepark Sci, Organization & Counseling Ltd.: Kyrenia, Cyprus, 2017; pp. 190–197.

Mičiak, M. The Efficiency of Investment in Human Capital in IT Enterprises. Transp. Res. Procedia 2019, 40, 1134–1140.

BBC. Environmental Sustainability. Available online: https://www.bbc.co.uk/aboutthebbc/reports/policies/sustainability/ (accessed on 28 February 2024).

CNN. Sustainable Living. Available online: https://www.cnn.com/cnn-underscored/home/sustainable-living (accessed on 28 February 2024).

Government Offices of Sweden. The Global Goals and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Available online: https://www.government.se/government-policy/the-global-goals-and-the-2030-Agenda-for-sustainable-development/ (accessed on 28 February 2024).

Soviar, J.; Holubčík, M.; Vodák, J. Cooperation Management on Construction Business Market in the Slovak Republic—An Insight from a Company. Procedia Eng. 2017, 192, 818–823.

Holubčík, M.; Soviar, J. Main Problems of Cooperation Management: Insights from Slovak Companies. Sustainability 2021, 13, 6736.

Holubcik, M.; Soviar, J.; Lendel, V. Sustainable Cooperation Management—Insights from a Selected Company. Entrep. Sustain. Issues 2022, 10, 429–447.

Hrusovska, D.; Demjanovicova, M.; Tumova, D.; Miciak, M. Analysis of The Perception of Sustainability from the Perspective of Entrepreneurs and Consumers in The Food Industry in Slovakia. In Proceedings of the Education Excellence and Innovation Management: A 2025 Vision To Sustain Economic Development During Global Challenges, Seville, Spain, 1–2 April 2020; Soliman, K.S., Ed.; Int Business Information Management Assoc-Ibima: Norristown, PA, USA, 2020; pp. 2737–2748.

Kozena, M.; Jelinkova, L. Specifics of Performance Measurement and Management Manufacturing Company. In Proceedings of the Political Sciences, Law, Finance, Economics and Tourism, Vol II, Albena, Bulgaria, 1–10 September 2014; Stef92 Technology Ltd.: Sofia, Bulgaria; pp. 655–662.

Varmus, M.; Kubina, M.; Boško, P.; Mičiak, M. Application of the Perceived Popularity of Sports to Support the Sustainable Management of Sports Organizations. Sustainability 2022, 14, 1927.

Blašková, M.; Tumová, D.; Blaško, R.; Majchrzak-Lepczyk, J. Spirals of Sustainable Academic Motivation, Creativity, and Trust of Higher Education Staff. Sustainability 2021, 13, 7057.

Pereno, A.; Eriksson, D. A Multi-Stakeholder Perspective on Sustainable Healthcare: From 2030 Onwards. Futures 2020, 122, 102605.

Streimikiene, D.; Svagzdiene, B.; Jasinskas, E.; Simanavicius, A. Sustainable Tourism Development and Competitiveness: The Systematic Literature Review. Sustain. Dev. 2021, 29, 259–271.

Kramar, R. Sustainable Human Resource Management: Six Defining Characteristics. Asia Pac. J. Hum. Resour. 2022, 60, 146–170.

Rutkauskas, A.V. Using Sustainability Engineering to Gain Universal Sustainability Efficiency. Sustainability 2012, 4, 1135–1153.

Demastus, J.; Landrum, N.E. Organizational Sustainability Schemes Align with Weak Sustainability. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2023, 33, 707–725.

Boudreau, J.W.; Ramstad, P.M. Talentship, Talent Segmentation, and Sustainability: A New HR Decision Science Paradigm for a New Strategy Definition. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2005, 44, 129–136.

Gollan, P.J. Human Resources, Capabilities and Sustainability; Dunphy, D., Benveniste, J., Griffiths, A., Sutton, P., Eds.; George Allen & Unwin Ltd.: St. Leonards, NSW, Austalia, 2000; pp. 55–77. ISBN 978-1-86508-228-8.

Avery, G.C.; Bergsteiner, H. Sustainable Leadership Practices for Enhancing Business Resilience and Performance. Strategy Leadersh. 2011, 39, 5–15.

Wilkinson, A.; Hill, M.; Gollan, P. The Sustainability Debate. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 2001, 21, 1492–1502.

Müller-Christ, G.; Remer, A. Umweltwirtschaft oder Wirtschaftsökologie? Vorüberlegungen zu einer Theorie des Ressourcenmanagements. In Betriebliches Umweltmanagement im 21. Jahrhundert: Aspekte, Aufgaben, Perspektiven; Seidel, E., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1999; pp. 69–87. ISBN 978-3-642-60245-0.

Ehnert, I.; Parsa, S.; Roper, I.; Wagner, M.; Muller-Camen, M. Reporting on Sustainability and HRM: A Comparative Study of Sustainability Reporting Practices by the World’s Largest Companies. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2016, 27, 88–108.

Wikhamn, W. Innovation, Sustainable HRM and Customer Satisfaction. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2019, 76, 102–110.

Bush, J.T. Win-Win-Lose? Sustainable HRM and the Promotion of Unsustainable Employee Outcomes. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 2020, 30, 100676.

Mazur, B.; Walczyna, A. Bridging Sustainable Human Resource Management and Corporate Sustainability. Sustainability 2020, 12, 8987.

Richards, J. Putting Employees at the Centre of Sustainable HRM: A Review, Map and Research Agenda. Empl. Relat. Int. J. 2020, 44, 533–554.

Poon, T.S.-C.; Law, K.K. Sustainable HRM: An Extension of the Paradox Perspective. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 2022, 32, 100818.

Harcourt, M.; Wood, G.; Roper, I. The Importance of Legislated Employment Mark Harcourt, Protection for Worker Commitment in Geoffrey Wood Coordinated Market Economies. J. Econ. Issues 2007, 41, 961–980.

Hobelsberger, C. Sustainability and HRM in International Supply Chains. In Sustainability and Human Resource Management: Developing Sustainable Business Organizations; Ehnert, I., Harry, W., Zink, K.J., Eds.; CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2014; pp. 379–400. ISBN 978-3-642-37524-8.

Spooner, K.; Kaine, S. Defining Sustainability and Human Resource Management. Int. Employ. Relat. Rev. 2020, 16, 70–81.

Booth, J.E.; Park, K.W.; Glomb, T.M. Employer-Supported Volunteering Benefits: Gift Exchange among Employers, Employees, and Volunteer Organizations. Hum. Resour. Manage. 2009, 48, 227–249.

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.