PERMUTATION POLYNOMIALS AS BIJECTIVE PRIMITIVES IN CRYPTOGRAPHIC PROTOCOL DESIGN FOR NETWORK SECURITY: CONSTRUCTIONS, SECURITY PROPERTIES, AND APPLICATIONS

Main Article Content

Deepshikha
Dr.Narendra Swami

Abstract

Permutation polynomials polynomials over a finite ring or field that induce a bijective map occupy a foundational position in the design of cryptographic primitives that secure networked communication. Because confidentiality, integrity, and authenticity in network-security protocols depend on invertible transformations, any polynomial map that is provably bijective over a finite algebraic structure is a natural building block for substitution boxes (S-boxes), stream-cipher state-update functions, public-key trapdoor maps, and Latin-square-based authentication schemes. This paper synthesizes the algebraic theory of permutation polynomials Hermite’s criterion, the Akbary–Ghioca–Wang (AGW) criterion, Dickson polynomials, butterfly-structure constructions, and Rivest’s characterization of permutation polynomials modulo 2w and maps each construction onto a concrete role within cryptographic protocols. Comparative tables summarize differential uniformity, nonlinearity, and algebraic degree for monomial, Dickson, butterfly-structure, and modular permutation-polynomial constructions, the properties that govern resistance to differential, linear, and boomerang cryptanalysis. The paper argues that permutation-polynomial-based primitives offer a mathematically transparent alternative to empirically tuned S-boxes, illustrates their role in RSA, RC6, and modern lightweight block-cipher designs, and closes with open problems in constructing permutations that are simultaneously optimal in differential and boomerang uniformity for constrained network-security environments such as IoT key-exchange protocols.

Article Details

How to Cite
Deepshikha, & Dr.Narendra Swami. (2025). PERMUTATION POLYNOMIALS AS BIJECTIVE PRIMITIVES IN CRYPTOGRAPHIC PROTOCOL DESIGN FOR NETWORK SECURITY: CONSTRUCTIONS, SECURITY PROPERTIES, AND APPLICATIONS. International Journal of Advanced Research and Multidisciplinary Trends (IJARMT), 2(4), 940–950. Retrieved from https://www.ijarmt.com/index.php/j/article/view/1264
Section
Articles

References

Akbary, A., Ghioca, D., & Wang, Q. (2011). On constructing permutations of finite fields. Finite Fields and Their Applications, 17(1), 51–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ffa.2010.10.002

Diffie, W., & Hellman, M. (1976). New directions in cryptography. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 22(6), 644–654. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.1976.1055638

Hou, X. (2015). Permutation polynomials over finite fields—A survey of recent advances. Finite Fields and Their Applications, 32, 82–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ffa.2014.10.001

Laigle-Chapuy, Y. (2007). Permutation polynomials and applications to coding theory. Finite Fields and Their Applications, 13(1), 58–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ffa.2005.08.003

Li, K., Li, C., Helleseth, T., & Qu, L. (2021). Cryptographically strong permutations from the butterfly structure. Designs, Codes and Cryptography, 89(4), 737–761. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10623-020-00837-5

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.